Home
Holocaust: British Link
Share
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mailMade Popular Aug 18 2009
Vatican City :
Thanks to the JTA, information from local Vatican’s newspaper L’Osservatore Romano reaches the public worldwide and it is a really interesting, timeless assertion of Britain and the USA detailed knowledge of Hitler’s plans to exterminate the Jews during WWII and their intended failure to prevent Holocaust.
According to an article, British and American governments ignored, downplayed or even suppressed intelligence reports about the Nazi’s plans. They refrained from bombing even trail rails /roads to disrupt supply of the European concentration camps, choosing not to.
It quoted from the diary of Henry Morgenthau Jr., the war-time US secretary of the treasury, who described London’s alleged indifference to the plight of the Jews as “a Satanic combination of British chill and diplomatic double talk”.
Would one be wondering that these days UK officials paid at the UN providing “investigation” in Palestine, already blame Israel and the Jews in all evil even prior to the UN officially deliberating their report, as both local Jews and Arabs refused to officially participate in?
Picture of a historical Internet site
Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
RSS 
Why only UK? Both USA and UK deliberately ignored the apprehensions of holocaust in Germany. All this was an imperialist game to indulge in war for colonizing more and more and countries.
(Global Perspectives)
Aleksy,
Is modern Ossetia among these colonies?
I will laugh laudly if one says such ”countries” as Abkhazia, Ossetia, Kosovo, the PA and even Georgia with Armenia are really independent entities.
Look at Jordan, Nauru, Fiji, Dominica, Andorra, Monaco-and list of independent UN voters could be extended longer.
Is modern Ossetia among these colonies?
I will laugh laudly if one says such ”countries” as Abkhazia, Ossetia, Kosovo, the PA and even Georgia with Armenia are really independent entities.
Look at Jordan, Nauru, Fiji, Dominica, Andorra, Monaco-and list of independent UN voters could be extended longer.
(Global Perspectives)
What about Yassir Arafat’s uncle?
Did he help his nephew a bit to comprehend an issue?
Did he help his nephew a bit to comprehend an issue?
(Global Perspectives)
The early Zionists were also tied to the Nazis, or sought such ties:
http://marcovilla.instablogs.com/entry/zionisms-alliance-with-the-nazis/
http://marcovilla.instablogs.com/entry/zionisms-alliance-with-the-nazis/
(Global Perspectives)
As understood, mufti Hajj Amine, an uncle of Yassir Arafat, wa a very Hitler/Holocaust supporter, which does explain the Israeli authorities’ publicizing of his Hitler visit photo worldwide.
What was his link with Zionists? Collaborating with Nazi Germany on exterminating the Jews-and Zionists among them-around the globe? Or consultancies with Hitler’s then British friends on doing this more human, civilized and mean- http://mkwrk2.instablogs.com/entry/where-the-law-rules/ ?
What was his link with Zionists? Collaborating with Nazi Germany on exterminating the Jews-and Zionists among them-around the globe? Or consultancies with Hitler’s then British friends on doing this more human, civilized and mean- http://mkwrk2.instablogs.com/entry/where-the-law-rules/ ?
(Local Perspectives)
PT & Horhe B: “What about Yassir Arafat’s uncle?”
Despite Yasser Arafat’s claims to the contrary, Haj Amin al-Husseini was not related to him in any way. This is just one of the many lies Arafat promoted. Another was that the Cairo-born and bred Egyptian Arafat claimed to be a Palestinian refugee.
Marco Villa: This is not the first time you posted this, and it remains the same garbage as before.
Comparing tentative contacts with the Nazis by Lehi (whom I have no sympathy for) on the principle of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” that came to nothing with the actions of a man who incited the Arab riots of 1921, 1929 and 1936, fled to Hitler’s Germany when the British issued an arrest warrant for him, knew about, approved and adopted the ”Final Solution” for implementation in the Middle East should Nazi Germany defeat the Allies in North Africa and helped the Nazis raise not one, not two, but THREE Muslim SS divisions in Bosnia that committed (and were tried) for crimes against humanity, is a bit of a stretch, even for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni
Haj Amin al-Husseini was declared a war criminal by the Nuremberg Commission, tried and convicted but escaped, finding sanctuary in Egypt, which denied Yugoslavia his extradition for imprisonment. Comparing him with Anwar Al-Sadat is also a bit of a stretch—whatever Sadat’s past beliefs may have been, he had the courage to address the Israeli Knesset in person and forge a peace treaty with another former terrorist, Menachem Begin—and he paid for his courage with his life.
No matter how often you repeat a lie, Marco, it will never magically turn into the truth.
= = =
The British have a shameful past of lying to both the Arabs and the Jews in the Middle East. Their government made conflicting promises to both parties about the future of Palestine should the Allies win WW I, and they went back on their promises to both sides, as well.
For an excellent article on “Perfidious Albion”, read:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/05/triple_cross_how_britain_creat.html
Unlike the author, I don’t blame the British entirely for the Arab-Israeli conflict, but they certainly did have a major part in creating it, just as they helped create the India-Pakistan conflict.
Despite Yasser Arafat’s claims to the contrary, Haj Amin al-Husseini was not related to him in any way. This is just one of the many lies Arafat promoted. Another was that the Cairo-born and bred Egyptian Arafat claimed to be a Palestinian refugee.
Marco Villa: This is not the first time you posted this, and it remains the same garbage as before.
Comparing tentative contacts with the Nazis by Lehi (whom I have no sympathy for) on the principle of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” that came to nothing with the actions of a man who incited the Arab riots of 1921, 1929 and 1936, fled to Hitler’s Germany when the British issued an arrest warrant for him, knew about, approved and adopted the ”Final Solution” for implementation in the Middle East should Nazi Germany defeat the Allies in North Africa and helped the Nazis raise not one, not two, but THREE Muslim SS divisions in Bosnia that committed (and were tried) for crimes against humanity, is a bit of a stretch, even for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni
Haj Amin al-Husseini was declared a war criminal by the Nuremberg Commission, tried and convicted but escaped, finding sanctuary in Egypt, which denied Yugoslavia his extradition for imprisonment. Comparing him with Anwar Al-Sadat is also a bit of a stretch—whatever Sadat’s past beliefs may have been, he had the courage to address the Israeli Knesset in person and forge a peace treaty with another former terrorist, Menachem Begin—and he paid for his courage with his life.
No matter how often you repeat a lie, Marco, it will never magically turn into the truth.
= = =
The British have a shameful past of lying to both the Arabs and the Jews in the Middle East. Their government made conflicting promises to both parties about the future of Palestine should the Allies win WW I, and they went back on their promises to both sides, as well.
For an excellent article on “Perfidious Albion”, read:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/05/triple_cross_how_britain_creat.html
Unlike the author, I don’t blame the British entirely for the Arab-Israeli conflict, but they certainly did have a major part in creating it, just as they helped create the India-Pakistan conflict.
(Global Perspectives)
Once again we see the arrogance of the Zionist-Jew mentality.
You see, it is okay for Zionists to have contacts with Nazis under the rubric of ”the enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
But when Palestinians do the exact same thing for the exact same reason, they are condemned.
And who’s the enemy of whom? The British were the only reasons were able to immigrate to Palestine in the first place. Britain supported Zionism, it was a friend to the Jews and the enemy of Palestinians.
But, you see, Zionists-Jews believe they are ”God’s Chosen People” with special rights that no one else has. They are entitled to do what they wish, but if someone does like wise they issue self-righteous condemnations.
And Zionists Jews of course state that Palestinians were not motivated by equal political calculations in reaching out to the Nazis, but Arabs in general and Palestinians in particular are breed Nazis.
The lies and arrogance of Zionist Jew hoodlums knows no bounds.
You see, it is okay for Zionists to have contacts with Nazis under the rubric of ”the enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
But when Palestinians do the exact same thing for the exact same reason, they are condemned.
And who’s the enemy of whom? The British were the only reasons were able to immigrate to Palestine in the first place. Britain supported Zionism, it was a friend to the Jews and the enemy of Palestinians.
But, you see, Zionists-Jews believe they are ”God’s Chosen People” with special rights that no one else has. They are entitled to do what they wish, but if someone does like wise they issue self-righteous condemnations.
And Zionists Jews of course state that Palestinians were not motivated by equal political calculations in reaching out to the Nazis, but Arabs in general and Palestinians in particular are breed Nazis.
The lies and arrogance of Zionist Jew hoodlums knows no bounds.
(Global Perspectives)
MV: “It is okay for Zionists to have contacts with Nazis under the rubric of ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend’, but when Palestinians do the exact same thing for the exact same reason, they are condemned.”
Marco, if you can’t see the difference between negotiations that were terminated and an active six-year collaboration, then you’ve blinded yourself to the truth from the word “go”.
MV: ”The British were the only reasons were able to immigrate to Palestine in the first place. Britain supported Zionism, it was a friend to the Jews and the enemy of Palestinians.”
The British were the friends of the British, no one else. If the British “supported” Zionism, then I prefer no support at all. The bias of the British in favor of the Arab population was so blatant that even you shouldn’t be able to avoid it as fact. Over the 30 years the Brits sat in Palestine they broke every single promise made to the Jews and about half the promises they made to the Arabs. On the eve of WW II, Britain slammed the door of immigration to Palestine in the face of Europe’s Jews with their White Paper of 1939, condemning at least tens of thousands of Jews (and possibly many more) who might have been saved, to death in concentration camps. If this is British “support”, then they should go and give their “support” to my enemies—I can do without “support” of that nature, thank you.
MV: “Palestinians were not motivated by equal political calculations in reaching out to the Nazis, but Arabs in general and Palestinians in particular are breed Nazis.”
Arabs in general (and the Mufti of Jerusalem in particular) were willing accomplices of Nazi Germany. This is a fact you can’t get around, no matter how you try. The Mufti raised three MUSLIM SS divisions from among the Bosnian Muslims, Arabs in North Africa spied for the Germans and the Iraqi government declared its preference for the Nazis over the Allies. Arab governments in North Africa assisted the Nazis in effecting several transports of North African Jews to the concentration camps in Europe. As far back as the mid-1930s, Arab governments began enacting Nuremberg-type anti-Jewish laws, many of which are still in effect.
These facts, among others, indicate that there’s no logical way to equate tentative contacts made by a splinter group of Jews to the level of collaboration and participation of Arabs. It’s is the kind of comparison only a demented propagandist could try to make when dealing with an ignorant audience.
Perhaps you would care to explain why, even today, the two best-selling books in the Arab world translated from foreign languages into Arabic are “Mein Kampf” and “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”?
Marco, if you can’t see the difference between negotiations that were terminated and an active six-year collaboration, then you’ve blinded yourself to the truth from the word “go”.
MV: ”The British were the only reasons were able to immigrate to Palestine in the first place. Britain supported Zionism, it was a friend to the Jews and the enemy of Palestinians.”
The British were the friends of the British, no one else. If the British “supported” Zionism, then I prefer no support at all. The bias of the British in favor of the Arab population was so blatant that even you shouldn’t be able to avoid it as fact. Over the 30 years the Brits sat in Palestine they broke every single promise made to the Jews and about half the promises they made to the Arabs. On the eve of WW II, Britain slammed the door of immigration to Palestine in the face of Europe’s Jews with their White Paper of 1939, condemning at least tens of thousands of Jews (and possibly many more) who might have been saved, to death in concentration camps. If this is British “support”, then they should go and give their “support” to my enemies—I can do without “support” of that nature, thank you.
MV: “Palestinians were not motivated by equal political calculations in reaching out to the Nazis, but Arabs in general and Palestinians in particular are breed Nazis.”
Arabs in general (and the Mufti of Jerusalem in particular) were willing accomplices of Nazi Germany. This is a fact you can’t get around, no matter how you try. The Mufti raised three MUSLIM SS divisions from among the Bosnian Muslims, Arabs in North Africa spied for the Germans and the Iraqi government declared its preference for the Nazis over the Allies. Arab governments in North Africa assisted the Nazis in effecting several transports of North African Jews to the concentration camps in Europe. As far back as the mid-1930s, Arab governments began enacting Nuremberg-type anti-Jewish laws, many of which are still in effect.
These facts, among others, indicate that there’s no logical way to equate tentative contacts made by a splinter group of Jews to the level of collaboration and participation of Arabs. It’s is the kind of comparison only a demented propagandist could try to make when dealing with an ignorant audience.
Perhaps you would care to explain why, even today, the two best-selling books in the Arab world translated from foreign languages into Arabic are “Mein Kampf” and “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”?
(Global Perspectives)
Yeah,
What about Haaretz of Sweden media’s lies of IDF harvesting organs from Palestinians in Gaza?
It seems, someone tries to distract a world from a truth of Kosoco-1999.
What about Haaretz of Sweden media’s lies of IDF harvesting organs from Palestinians in Gaza?
It seems, someone tries to distract a world from a truth of Kosoco-1999.
(Global Perspectives)
Add your Comment
God bless you for this info and let all victims of English hypocrisy rest in peace.